Richman Photo Art
  • Home
  • News
  • Portfolios
    • New Jersey Landscapes
    • Arthur Kill
  • Galleries
    • Bridges
    • Courthouses
    • International Travel
    • Natural World
    • Sunrise/Sunset
    • Traveling the USA
    • New Jersey
  • Through the Lens
  • The Photographer
  • Contact

The Relevance of Size

1/5/2017

5 Comments

 
.The East Building of the National Gallery in Washington, D.C., has reopened after extensive renovation, and it now rivals and compares favorably with MOMA in New York and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.  Photography is not only the subject of special exhibits, but is also integrated within other collections, a feature seemingly becoming more common.

Two exhibits raised a particular question.  One was a room devoted to the Düsseldorf School of Photography, including photographers Thomas Struth and Thomas Ruff among others, whose life size photographs dominate the room.  In fact, the curator card on the wall tells us “the monumental size of their pictures produces an immersive quality, challenging our expectations of the nature of the medium and the boundaries between photography and painting.”

A second room, part of the American art exhibition, featured two photographs by Charles Sheeler of the same scene, but framed and displayed in different sizes.  The larger was not monumental, and both images are within the normal range of sizes of traditional photography of Sheeler’s time.  Putting aside for the moment the exposure and other issues (remember this is a photograph of a photograph), we can compare side by side which image size is preferable.

But the broader question raised by the Düsseldorf School images is reminiscent of the early Pictorialism of photography.  In the 19th century, as photographers sought to establish photography as a respectable medium of art (and not just as a utilitarian exercise), they engaged in posed pictures to emulate art.  We then saw the Photo Secessionists who sought to establish photography as an art form independent of painting and its replication.  Have we come full circle?

This is not to criticize the work represented, but merely to note that while these are powerful works, and size does not, in all instances, make the image.  The photography of Walker Evans, Robert Frank and Berenice Abbott, to name just three, are cases in point.

********

For information on any photos or posts on this website, email me at [email protected].


5 Comments
Lonnie
1/5/2017 10:22:15 am

Well said. I'm looking forward to your next post.

Reply
Jane K.
1/5/2017 01:12:06 pm

Very interesting blog posts. Thanks for writing these.

Reply
Charley
1/6/2017 09:45:26 am

I don't know about coming full circle, but you raise some interesting questions. Well done.

Reply
Jon
1/6/2017 10:36:46 am

I enjoyed this.

Reply
Thomas
1/8/2017 10:16:49 am

I am enjoying your posts thus far. It's nice to get a new perspective on things we take for granted.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Steven Richman is an attorney practicing in New Jersey. He has lectured before photography clubs on various topics, including the legal rights of photographers. His photography has been exhibited in museums, is in private collections, and is also represented in the permanent collection of the New Jersey State Museum. ​

    Archives

    December 2022
    January 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016

Proudly powered by Weebly